I believe in science. All things are possible until they can be unproven. There could be a god, there could be many gods, without proof one cannot prove the entity's (if what we know as god
is an entity) existence. Generally I don't believe in god but I also don't doubt there is a possibility. I feel that the normal (Jewish/Christan/Muslim) understanding of god is a bit too fantastic for me and I feel like god is more like a possible name for the force in atoms that keeps them going...
I'm sorry, but that question... it's just getting "old"
Unfortunately, all it shows is that you find it difficult to consider another person's point of view from their perspective and that all you can consider is your own perspective.
The only thing one could say is that because there is no proof for gods existence god does not exist. However that is also faulty. There was one time when humans did not know that air is a form of matter and that humans inhale oxygen to live. Back then one could say that there is no proof of air. Now it just seems ridiculous. Can we really deny the existence of god(s). Just because we can't prove it?
I guess we also can't prove that Hogwarts doesn't exist either with that logic though...
One can say if god exists as an entity he must adhere to laws of physics and natural matter. Then one could say he must have been created by something because if he existed before matter he could not be an entity.
So I guess, is god made of matter? Where did matter come from? Matter cannot be created of destroyed.... maybe if we found how matter was created we'd find god?
Religion is a faith, a belief. If a person believes in something, they don't need proof of a higher being and they don't need to ask if that higher being was "created". It's irrelevant (to them).
Just as you need proof to believe in a God, you believe that a creator must in turn, have had a creator, but those with faith don't need it.
I'd argue that anyone who has blind faith in something is a fool (no offense, seriously). Just as one wouldn't have faith in a lion to not eat a baby, or have faith that the bum on the corner uses your money for food and help to get them back into a job even when they consistently smell like booze. There must be a reason to believe in something other than, 'cause this book told me to.
I guess then my question is why do you believe, honestly, if you believe? To anyone who believes, why do you believe? One cannot 'just' believe, you must have a reason.
We can deduce that life came from
electicity and water that formed amino acids which in turn created the fist life forms. Thus, there is no need of a creator if god was created from a similar reaction. Although god could be something different. God isn't necessarily what is popular to believe perhaps god is electricity? It does give life....

or maybe back to the matter thing, god supposedly created matter... what creates matter? Is that the ultimate key?
There are plenty of people in this world who won't believe in anything they can't see or have proven to them, so you're not alone at all
I've been accused of being close minded over my beliefs, but in reality, I've always found it disappointing that it has been another person who refuses to open their own mind to consider other points of view.
It's not that people need proof to validate belief it's that something is unlikely to exist without proof. For most things we can find proof. The only thing that can be proven is that we do not know where matter comes from (which could be proof of god) and people have long believed in god(s) since first human recorded time. This is proof enough for me to consider the possibility.
....

this might sound retarded but at least Wica is rooted in physical attributes of stuff and the unknown power of the human mind. I don't believe in it entirely, again it can't be proven, but things rooted in reality are much more believable than things rooted in blind faith.
Is there a god? I don't know. Does the concept seem a bit irrational? Yeah, it kinda does. Does god not exist? Who knows?