Evolution- Our world came from a source a chunk of matter colliding into another matter that caused a chain reaction, and what is known as our "universe" came to be. Eventually, there was this "Primordial ooze" and from it came simple life-forms that evolved over thousands of years. Following the evolution, a meteor hit and covered our atmosphere with dust. The dust cooled the atmosphere and caused an ice age. Mankind evolved from primates and yada yada, history, something or other, here we are today.
Intelligent Design- There was only God to begin with. God was, and that was the universe. This God spoke, and there was a universe, light, land, plants, animals, and humans. Humans were not created as animals but as a God-like being given the task of subduing the land they had. Some long history later, here we are.
Agnostic- Mankind cannot know their origins, lest they were there.
There presents an arguements that have dated back to ages beyond our common history's notice. It's a difficult decision to make, however, some have been brought to a crossroads. The discussion- Evolution and Creation. Agnostic shant be in this particular thread, however, neutralism is.
I would like to start the discussion with this, how can one prove evolution is more correct than creation?
Edit: Please read this before posting any reply: https://www.tamatalk.com/IB/index.php?showt...dpost&p=1807954
Thank you, TM
Intelligent Design- There was only God to begin with. God was, and that was the universe. This God spoke, and there was a universe, light, land, plants, animals, and humans. Humans were not created as animals but as a God-like being given the task of subduing the land they had. Some long history later, here we are.
Agnostic- Mankind cannot know their origins, lest they were there.
There presents an arguements that have dated back to ages beyond our common history's notice. It's a difficult decision to make, however, some have been brought to a crossroads. The discussion- Evolution and Creation. Agnostic shant be in this particular thread, however, neutralism is.
I would like to start the discussion with this, how can one prove evolution is more correct than creation?
Edit: Please read this before posting any reply: https://www.tamatalk.com/IB/index.php?showt...dpost&p=1807954
Thank you, TM
Last edited by a moderator: