.chasm.
Well-known member
I saw the topic of euthanasia on a couple of other discussions here, so I was wondering what everyone's opinions on it were.
Euthanasia, or a 'mercy killing', is the act of ending a person's life prematurely due to an illness, disease or disability. It is currently illegal in most countries, though places like Switzerland and the Netherlands allow it. There are three types of euthanasia:
• Voluntary, where a person requests help with ending their life, usually from a doctor or family member (also referred to as assisted suicide).
• Non-voluntary euthanasia, where a person is unable to request it, but it is believed to be in their best interests (for example, if someone is in a coma).
• Involuntary, where a person is killed without consultation or agreement (such as in Nazi Germany, where the mentally ill and disabled were mass-murdered).
There are also two methods of euthanasia
• Active, where actions are taken to kill someone directly, such as a lethal injection.
• Passive, where treatment is withheld so that a person will die because of an illness, such as turning off a life support machine.
Personally, I think that euthanasia should be allowed without question when a person requests it, using whichever method is preferred.. the decision to end their life should primarily be that person's responsibility, and refusing someone the right to die when they are in pain is wrong. Also, if someone is ill enough that they can't request to be killed, but it is thought that they can't recover, I think that the family should be allowed to decide whether euthanasia is the best option. However, this should only be decided after consultation. I also think that 'living wills', where a healthy person writes what they would like to happen in the case of serious illness or injury, should be legally binding, as doctors can currently ignore the person's earlier wishes and carry on with care. If a person has written in a living will that they would like to die under those circumstances, their wishes should be respected.
Euthanasia, or a 'mercy killing', is the act of ending a person's life prematurely due to an illness, disease or disability. It is currently illegal in most countries, though places like Switzerland and the Netherlands allow it. There are three types of euthanasia:
• Voluntary, where a person requests help with ending their life, usually from a doctor or family member (also referred to as assisted suicide).
• Non-voluntary euthanasia, where a person is unable to request it, but it is believed to be in their best interests (for example, if someone is in a coma).
• Involuntary, where a person is killed without consultation or agreement (such as in Nazi Germany, where the mentally ill and disabled were mass-murdered).
There are also two methods of euthanasia
• Active, where actions are taken to kill someone directly, such as a lethal injection.
• Passive, where treatment is withheld so that a person will die because of an illness, such as turning off a life support machine.
Personally, I think that euthanasia should be allowed without question when a person requests it, using whichever method is preferred.. the decision to end their life should primarily be that person's responsibility, and refusing someone the right to die when they are in pain is wrong. Also, if someone is ill enough that they can't request to be killed, but it is thought that they can't recover, I think that the family should be allowed to decide whether euthanasia is the best option. However, this should only be decided after consultation. I also think that 'living wills', where a healthy person writes what they would like to happen in the case of serious illness or injury, should be legally binding, as doctors can currently ignore the person's earlier wishes and carry on with care. If a person has written in a living will that they would like to die under those circumstances, their wishes should be respected.
Last edited by a moderator: